My notes from a tutorial session including Kjartan and Tim.
Current material pinned-up, ca 24 A3s. WIll be presetned in Oloif´s mid-term seminar next Monday.
Board/matrix with timeline (not visible), four levels or striations:
– process/links/methods
– context/analysis
– tests/results
– sketches
Tests of what? Should test sketches.
Kjartan: is there a thesis? What are the benefits of technical solutions?
Presentation includes a sketch proposal:
A low volume, with differentiation is height that allows passage. Sloping roofs, and internar terraces with aprtures for light. Yet not looked into the variations and their effects locally and globally.
Drivers for development (technical and design wise):
1 urban aspects
2 sun studies
3rd driver should be added: interior communications and infrastructure, especially needed for office spaces.
Important to work with the presentation for the mid term in a week. Keep posters on a wall, add graphics to make it legible, and clarify panels one-by-one.
Kjartan: When the final proposal has been developed, how can it be assessed in relation to technical performance? It must be compared to references with similar examples with an architectural challenge.
Very important to use the seminar next week to test a presentation form that connects architectural principles and technical performance.
Time to design formal principles, because they affect the performance.
Look at Mattias Rubin de Lima´s diploma thesis.
Leave a Reply