Category: ParaTable design loop

Paratable 20100713

Posted by July 20, 2010

Additional work on the full scale prototype. There is still an issue with rotation, and when laminating the parts of the structure with glue, we had a first breach of a part. This was also a result of increased stress to the corners due to reinforcements of the vertical sides to prevent bulge, see image below.

Full assembly with alternete leg solution
Full assembly with alternete leg solution
Reinforcement on horizontal sections ensures they do not bulge
Reinforcement on horizontal sections ensures they do not bulge
Possible way to modularize undercarriage (showing 2 of 3)
Possible way to modularize undercarriage (showing 2 of 3)

Paratable 20100628

Posted by June 28, 2010

A full scale test of alternate legs, that proved quite successful. The rotation is now reduced to a minimum. This version will be refined to complete the first full scale prototype. In parallel, the digital  model will be updated according to lessons learned in preparation for a second full scale prototype.

legs redesigned into a box shape
legs redesigned into a box configuration
leg detail
leg detail
laminated leg in jig
laminated leg in jig
laminatedd leg
laminated leg

Paratable 20100617

Posted by June 17, 2010

A number of studies to solve the rotational problem, this seems to be a plausible solution. Compared to earlier studies, in this alternative the vertical leg is tapered. THe preferred alternative is here a thinner leg a the bottom. This will be tested in the workshop next week.

Three alternate versions of tapering leg
Three alternate versions of tapering leg
detail of preferred version
detail of preferred version
elevation
elevation
view with transparent tabletop
view with transparent tabletop
rendered detail of joint to table top
rendered detail of joint to table top

Paratable 20100608

Posted by June 9, 2010

Update on the work with the full scale physical prototype done. There is tendency for rotation of the tabletop that comes with material performance and the structural solution that needs to be overcome. The aim is to find a solution for this very soon, in order to move on to production issues. We are also considering to enter in the Asahikawa international furniture design competition, at the first stage this only requires visualizations.

paratable physical prototype
paratable physical prototype
structure detail
structure detail
rotational problems: overall rotation of tabletop potentially due to rotation of the joinins points between upper and lower leg and horizontal members
rotational problems: overall rotation of tabletop potentially due to rotation of the joinins points between upper and lower leg and horizontal members
alternate solution 1
alternate solution 1: fixing the joint
alternate solution 2
alternate solution 2: fixing joint to triangle
alternate solution 3
alternate solution 3: inside band fixing joints
alternate solution 4: widening the connection by inserting wedges that makes the point of intersection between top and bottom part of leg and horizontal triangle "wider", thereby adding structure that limits horizontal rotation and torque.
alternate solution 4: widening the connection by inserting wedges that makes the point of intersection between top and bottom part of leg and horizontal triangle "wider", thereby adding structure that limits horizontal rotation and torque.
alternate solution 5: "deep" triangular inside structure
alternate solution 5: "deep" triangular inside structure that stops horizontal members from torquing. Possibly the "cross" is enough to accomplish the same.
alternate solution 6: turning the vertical leg 90 degrees, which should make it stronger in the "rotational direction". When connected to the horizontal members, a box is created which further improves this
alternate solution 6: turning the vertical leg 90 degrees, which should make it stronger in the "rotational direction". When connected to the horizontal members, a box is created which further improves this. Image shows only a few of the vertical members, but the blue circle indicates how they are fixed together.
alternate solution 6 collage: rough photoshop on what alternative 6 would look like
alternate solution 6 collage: rough photoshop on what alternative 6 would look like
alternate solution 6 render 1: new assembly
alternate solution 6 render 1: new assembly
alternate solution 6 render 1: detail before assembly
alternate solution 6 render 1: detail before assembly
alternate solution 6 render 1: detail before assembly
alternate solution 6 render 1: detail before assembly

Paratable 20090611

Posted by June 11, 2009

First try in assembling the full scale prototype, done in the workshop at Beckmans.

Assembly
Assembly
Close-up of assembly
Close-up of assembly

ParaTable 081218


Images from today´s modelling session with Kalle Jönsson. Three models of the support frame were completed, in scale 1:5.

verticals members cut from GC pattern
vertical members cut from GC pattern
first test with wooden frame pre-soaked in water
first test with wooden frame soaked in water
second test with Meltolit welding metal
metal parts joined with plastic straps
second test with 9 members joined with plastic straps
second test fully assembled
third test fully assembled
third test detail
third test, showing horizontal members deforming

ParaTable 081216


New images uploaded, showing basic geometry for the three parts of each side of the table frame.









Meeting Vandalorum 20081203


As part of a trip to Jönköping and Värnamo which inclded two lectures, I had a very interesting meeting with Sune Nordgren and Johanna Lilja of Vandalorum. One of the main focuses is to put designers in contact with local producers, and they have a network of several hundred of small companies in the area. I gave them a brief presentation of my work from the thesis, and they were very excited. As an initial contact, I will select a few students from AA dip16, who could benefit from direct contact with these industries. In the long run I am obviously also interested in making use of this contact for my own research. There may very well be a potential for ParaTable here, although I am slightly concerned that Källemo is another important actor at Vandalorum. This could be very good of course, but the current idea is to try to produce the table through alternate channels, with more direct contact with small producers.

ParaTable 081202


Based on the first parametric GC model, I redesigned the support frame for better fit and higher geometrical control when all parts are joined. The frame has three distinct parts, which are tripled for the three “corners”. Two components are crossed fro side stability, and each corner-point has single planar post. The GC model is updated with the new scheme, so far the conrer post is modeled as a solid. Next step will be to set up the crossbars. A parallel fabricaiton scheme will be set up, in which the corner post is simply cut out of a sheet material, and the crossbars still need to be first fabriacted from a thicker sheet, then twisted into its final shape. On the 17th of Dec we will do first physical models in the workshop.

overall rhino model with the three sets of three components
detail of corner post
corner post showing the planar corner element
GC set up with first framwork for corner post
GC model with first bspline curve
GC model with second bspline curve
GC model with bspline surface
GC mode with solid
GC model, change of parameters changing material width

ParaTable 081116


I updated the parametric model of ParaTable, and I am currently working on the support frame (the structure) for the table, and the way it adapts to different tabletop configurations. The table overall shape is based on three simple points, as is the support frame. The intital studies are doen in Rhino surface modeler, in which the principe for the frame is set as a static construct. This build-up is then replicated in GenerativeComponents, in which the relation to the three controlling points is set-up, with additional variation is added through variables.

I will meet with Kalle Jönsson in December for a short workshop session around the materials used for both the tabletop and the frame. For the frame I am currently looking at a material that is fabricated to a unique form for each variant of the table, but also put in tension during assembly (like a wicker chair). I am not yet sure what material would be adequate, but for both tabletop and frame, we are possible looking for a recycled material. Images below shows the current stage of development in Rhino, with a final chosen static shape, and the parametric model, which is not yet completed. Before the December workshop I am hoping to finalize also with patterns for fabrication, that will be laser cut in preparation for our material tests.

I will look for a better way of displaying multiple images later on, as slideshow. For now, each stage can be viewed by clicking each image for better resolution.

helplines for Rhino initial model, in a configuration with a "waist".
1st iteration of table leg frame, no waist
2nd iteration no waist
3rd iteration, no waist, form differentiation
4th iteration, waist introduced
5th and chosen iteration, with waist
the three parts of the frame highlighted in yellow. These are then repeated three times.
Top of frame showing the assembly of the three members
bottom of frame showing the three members
GenerativeComponents (GC) model of table top and frame
GenerativeComponents (GC) model of table top and frame, changed one control point
GC model of table top and frame, changed one control point
GC model of table top and frame, changed one control point
GC model of table top and frame, detail of leg
GC model of table top and frame, detail of leg, change of waist horisontal variable
GC model of table top and frame, detail of leg, change of waist vertical variable
GC model of table top and frame, detail of leg, change of waist slack variable